Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Evinced Proposes Mobile Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0

Related stories

Perplexity Introducing Comet, an AI-Powered Web Browser

Perplexity, a company dedicated to advancing human curiosity through...

Hyland Adds Knowledge Enrichment to Innovation Cloud

Hyland has announced the launch of Knowledge Enrichment for...

Cognex Unveils OneVision Cloud for AI Machine Vision

Cognex Corporation, a global leader in machine vision technology,...

SAFE Boosts TPRM with Agentic AI, Automates Legacy Gaps

SAFE expands its fleet of AI agents with SnapShot...

Apera AI Launches Vue 9.50 for Advanced 4D Robot Vision

Apera AI, a pioneer in 4D Vision for industrial...
spot_imgspot_img

Evinced, the leading software company powering accessible web and mobile development, announced its first draft of Mobile Content Accessibility Guidelines (MCAG) in order to accelerate development of a national accessibility standard for mobile apps.

“At Evinced, we are deeply committed to furthering digital accessibility and inclusion. But the lack of truly mobile-specific accessibility guidelines has been a significant roadblock,” said Navin Thadani, Evinced CEO and Co-Founder. “To accelerate this, we invested many months of research, collaboration, and development to create this first draft of MCAG. With help from accessibility colleagues across the industry, we think there’s a real chance to extend this draft and possibly even fold it into WCAG someday, as a community effort that is overdue.”

Also Read: Blameless Unveils Backstage Integration to Revolutionize Service Catalog Management and Microservices Analysis

Why MCAG Is Needed: Prior to now, mobile app developers and accessibility reviewers have had to review mobile apps with respect to guidelines developed originally for desktop applications. While many of the principles in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines are general enough to be “borrowed” in this way for mobile apps, and some recent additions to WCAG have related more to mobile apps, significant problems exist nonetheless.

One example of this is that many regulatory bodies have taken different approaches to the problem of what parts of WCAG don’t apply to mobile apps. This creates an international patchwork of guidelines that makes development harder.

Other examples come from the fact that desktop and mobile experiences are fundamentally different. Consider “touch targets”, the part of a screen that activates a function like a button.  For web software, these can be quite small, since users are typically using a mouse to interact with the screen and the accuracy is pinpoint.1 By contrast, mobile app users typically rely on their fingers to interact with their phone screens. And as finger sizes vary broadly for a given user or among a set of users, touch targets need to be much larger. True mobile-specific accessibility guidelines would take this into account along with mobile accessibility principles from Google and Apple as well.

SOURCE: PRNewswire

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications


    Latest stories

    spot_img